The sleeping brain behaves as if it’s remembering something
October 8, 2012

In the background is an entorhinal cortex neuron that was studied. The blue-green trace shows neocortical slow oscillation while the yellow trace shows the persistent activity of entorhinal cortical neuron, even when the inputs from neocortex were silent. (Credit: Thomas T. G. Hahn, et al./UCLA)
UCLA researchers have discovered that the activity of a brain region known to be involved in learning, memory and Alzheimer’s disease behaves as if it’s remembering something during sleep, even under anesthesia — a finding that counters conventional theories about memory consolidation during sleep.
The research team simultaneously measured the activity of single neurons from multiple parts of the brain involved in memory formation. The technique allowed them to determine which brain region was activating other areas of the brain and how that activation was spreading, said study senior author Mayank R. Mehta, a professor of neurophysics in UCLA’s departments of neurology, neurobiology, physics and astronomy.
Mehta and his team looked at three connected brain regions in mice — the new brain (neocortex), the old brain (hippocampus), and the entorhinal cortex, an intermediate brain that connects the new and the old brains.
While previous studies have suggested that the dialogue between the old and the new brain during sleep was critical for memory formation, researchers had not investigated the contribution of the entorhinal cortex to this conversation, which turned out to be a game changer, Mehta said.
His team found that the entorhinal cortex showed what is called persistent activity, which is thought to mediate working memory during waking life — for example, when people pay close attention to remember things temporarily, such as recalling a phone number or following directions.
“The big surprise here is that this kind of persistent activity is happening during sleep, pretty much all the time.” Mehta said. “These results are entirely novel and surprising. In fact, this working memory-like persistent activity occurred in the entorhinal cortex even under anesthesia.”
The findings are important, Mehta said, because humans spend one-third of their lives sleeping and a lack of sleep results in adverse effects on health, including learning and memory problems.
Talking (to yourself) in your sleep
It had been shown previously that the neocortex and the hippocampus “talk” to each other during sleep, and it is believed that this conversation plays a critical role in establishing memories, or memory consolidation. However, no one was able to interpret the conversation.
“When you go to sleep, you can make the room dark and quiet and although there is no sensory input, the brain is still very active,” Mehta said. “We wanted to know why this was happening and what different parts of the brain were saying to each other.”
Mehta and his team developed an extremely sensitive monitoring system that allowed them to follow the activities of neurons from each of three targeted portions of the brain simultaneously, including the activity of a single neuron. This allowed them to decipher the precise communications, even when the neurons were seemingly quiet. They then developed a sophisticated mathematical analysis to decipher the complex conversation.
During sleep, the neocortex goes into a slow wave pattern for about 90 percent of that time. During this period, its activity slowly fluctuates between active and inactive states about once every second. Mehta and his team focused on the entorhinal cortex, which has many parts.
The outer part of the entorhinal cortex mirrored the neocortical activity. However, the inner part behaved differently. When the neocortex became inactive, the neurons in the inner entorhinal cortex persisted in the active state, as if they were remembering something the neocortex had recently “said,” a phenomenon called spontaneous persistent activity. Further, they found that when the inner part of the entorhinal cortex became spontaneously persistent, it prompted the hippocampus neurons to become very active. On the other hand, when the neocortex was active, the hippocampus became quieter. This data provided a clear interpretation of the conversation.
“During sleep the three parts of the brain are talking to each other in a very complex way,” he said. “The entorhinal neurons showed persistent activity, behaving as if they were remembering something even under anesthesia when the mice could not feel or smell or hear anything. Remarkably, this persistent activity sometimes lasted for more than a minute, a huge timescale in brain activity, which generally changes on a scale of one thousandth of a second.”
The neocortex drives memory consolidation during sleep
The findings challenge theories of brain communication during sleep, in which the hippocampus is expected to talk to, or drive, the neocortex. Mehta’s findings instead indicate that there is a third key actor in this complex dialogue, the entorhinal cortex, and that the neocortex is driving the entorhinal cortex, which in turn behaves as if it is remembering something. That, in turn, drives the hippocampus, while other activity patterns shut it down.
“This is a whole new way of thinking about memory consolidation theory. We found there is a new player involved in this process and it’s having an enormous impact,” Mehta said. “And what that third player is doing is being driven by the neocortex, not the hippocampus. This suggests that whatever is happening during sleep is not happening the way we thought it was. There are more players involved so the dialogue is far more complex, and the direction of the communication is the opposite of what was thought.”
Mehta theorizes that this process occurs during sleep as a way to unclutter memories and delete information that was processed during the day but is irrelevant. This results in the important memories becoming more salient and readily accessible. Notably, Alzheimer’s disease starts in the entorhinal cortex and patients have impaired sleep, so Mehta’s findings may have implications in that arena.
For this study, Mehta teamed with Thomas Hahn and Sven Berberich of Heidelberg University in Germany and the Max Planck Institute for Medical Research and James McFarland of Brown University and the UCLA Department of Physics. Going forward, the team will further study this brain activity to uncover the mechanisms behind it and determine if it influences subsequent behavioral performance. These results and related findings can be found here.
“These results provide the first direct evidence for persistent activity in medial entorhinal cortex layer neurons in vivo, and reveal its contribution to cortico-hippocampal interactions, which could be involved in working memory and learning of long behavioral sequences during behavior, and memory consolidation during sleep,” the study states.
The study was funded by the Whitehall Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, the National Science Foundation, the W. M. Keck Foundation, the German Ministry of Education and Research and the Max Planck Society.
Comments (4)
by Bri
I believe that the brain is processing the days new information. That is to say, it extracts meaningful events and integrates them with previous memories and learned responses. The brain breaks this new input down to an archetypical framework and figures it’s relationship to other stored archetypes. As an example, say the mouse encountered a predator and had to evade it. It might have nightmare type responses, as it recalled other examples and means of evading death. Sometimes possibly by freezing. Other times maybe by running, or even fighting. The relative success of these strategies and possible future responses, in relation to the success of this particular episode. It doesn’t have to be as strong an incedent as fight or flight. It could be the success of finding a food source, or building a nest. The big thing that makes brains work, is there ability to find commonalities, and applying them to future events. A good example of this was scientist that discovered the form of , I think it was benzene, or some similar molecule. He had been working for a long time trying to figure out it’s form, and it finally came to him in a dream while sleeping.
by Richard
MikeB – I like the way you make your arguments.
I have been using similar arguments for
many years to help explain to others where and how the thought systems of the brain/mind might work together.
Take a) for
instance. If I understand you correctly, your argument is that recorded activity in a
region “does not” necessarily confirm (label) the activity. (Ie. Activity = Process)
I agree. Each of these active regions or clusters are more likely to acting “in concert” as
part of a greater whole. Quantum processing becomes possible then when you consider these
points acting as discriminators, complex cross referencing hubs, areas that conduct
advanced algorithmic variables (picture when your mind uses obscure information in order to
“run the numbers.”) So with out going further, your argument that additional proofs is
required, I concur.
b) continues your argument citing your proofs, to c) where you close with a reference.
Here’s where I’d like to go on though.
Although I agree in context with your argument, I support the theory of the article.
The reason is because I believe they are on the right track.
The amount of data the human brain/mind must compute is beyond our comprehention. One of the reasons for this is because of the “quantum” processes that the brain is capable of performing.
One of the ways I believe the brain performs this function is through a cross referencing process similar to “tagging” of imagry on the internet. This process is “on going” and can be accessed at request (Somebody says “I need a screwdriver.” – Your mind (hears) the data and selects imagery of screwdrivers, the person or others (values) his cigarettes (hey, data passes by on its way to) Memory (I have a screwdriver in my desk) logic, motor, and nervous systems (action) etc.
This process not only continues during sleep, but is one of the reasons sleep is required by human physiology in order to survive. (Human record is 11 days without sleep I believe.)
At this time, the mind takes and files “ALL” that information. “We” see it because of “imagery” pieces are making associations and imprints.
I believe
by Marcos Marin
remembering to wake up.
by MikeB
Some observations:
a) “decipher … conversations” would mean, to most, understanding the information conveyed. Not here. They used filtering algorithms to clean up very noisy signals to determine that there was evidence of communication … no proof since we don’t know what any of the activity meant (no stimulus remember);
b) measured 3 regions simultaneously and observed what seemed to be intercommunication. Might be more credible if _all_ regions of brain are measured simultaneously … so what is presented is a theory (and interpretation) not a fact, four, five, six regions maybe more players in the equation?; and
c) this was all done in mice. So it’s really: “Sleeping Mice Brains Behave as if Remembering Something and we Think Human Brains do the Same Though we Haven’t Performed the Same Experiments on the Latter”