Walking again after spinal cord injury
June 1, 2012
Rats with spinal cord injuries and severe paralysis are now walking (and running) thanks to researchers at EPFL.
They found that a severed section of the spinal cord can make a comeback when its own innate intelligence and regenerative capacity is awakened.
The study points to a profound change in our understanding of the central nervous system. According to lead author Grégoire Courtine, it is yet unclear if similar rehabilitation techniques could work for humans, but the observed nerve growth hints at new methods for treating paralysis.
“After a couple of weeks of neurorehabilitation with a combination of a robotic harness and electrical-chemical stimulation, our rats are not only voluntarily initiating a walking gait, but they are soon sprinting, climbing up stairs and avoiding obstacles when stimulated,” explains Courtine, who holds the International Paraplegic Foundation (IRP) Chair in Spinal Cord Repair at EPFL.
Waking up the spinal cord
It is well known that the brain and spinal cord can adapt and recover from moderate injury, a quality known as neuroplasticity. But until now the spinal cord expressed so little plasticity after severe injury that recovery was impossible. Courtine’s research proves that, under certain conditions, plasticity and recovery can take place in these severe cases — but only if the dormant spinal column is first woken up.
To do this, Courtine and his team injected a chemical solution of monoamine agonists into the rats. These chemicals trigger cell responses by binding to specific dopamine, adrenaline, and serotonin receptors located on the spinal neurons. This cocktail replaces neurotransmitters released by brainstem pathways in healthy subjects and acts to excite neurons and ready them to coordinate lower body movement when the time is right.
Five to 10 minutes after the injection, the scientists electrically stimulated the spinal cord with electrodes implanted in the outermost layer of the spinal canal, called the epidural space. “This localized epidural stimulation sends continuous electrical signals through nerve fibers to the chemically excited neurons that control leg movement. All that is left was to initiate that movement,” explains Rubia van den Brand, contributing author to the study.
The innate intelligence of the spinal column
In 2009, Courtine already reported on restoring movement, albeit involuntary. He discovered that a stimulated rat spinal column — physically isolated from the brain from the lesion down — developed in a surprising way: It started taking over the task of modulating leg movement, allowing previously paralyzed animals to walk over treadmills.
These experiments revealed that the movement of the treadmill created sensory feedback that initiated walking. The innate intelligence of the spinal column took over, and walking essentially occurred without any input from the rat’s actual brain. This surprised the researchers and led them to believe that only a very weak signal from the brain was needed for the animals to initiate movement of their own volition.
To test this theory, Courtine replaced the treadmill with a device that vertically supported the subjects, a mechanical harness did not facilitate forward movement and only came into play when they lost balance, giving them the impression of having a healthy and working spinal column.
This encouraged the rats to will themselves toward a chocolate reward on the other end of the platform. “What they deemed willpower-based training translated into a fourfold increase in nerve fibers throughout the brain and spine — a regrowth that proves the tremendous potential for neuroplasticity even after severe central nervous system injury,” says Janine Heutschi, co-author in the study.
First human rehabilitation on the horizon
Courtine calls this regrowth “new ontogeny,” a sort of duplication of an infant’s growth phase. The researchers found that the newly formed fibers bypassed the original spinal lesion and allowed signals from the brain to reach the electrochemically awakened spine. And the signal was sufficiently strong to initiate movement over ground — without the treadmill — meaning the rats began to walk voluntarily towards the reward, entirely supporting their own weight with their hind legs.
“This is the world-cup of neurorehabilitation,” exclaims Courtine. “Our rats have become athletes when just weeks before they were completely paralyzed. I am talking about 100% recuperation of voluntary movement.”
In principle, the radical reaction of the rat spinal cord to treatment offers reason to believe that people with spinal cord injury will soon have some options on the horizon. Courtine is optimistic that human, phase-two trials will begin in a year or two at Balgrist University Hospital Spinal Cord Injury Centre in Zurich, Switzerland.
Meanwhile, researchers at EPFL are coordinating a nine million Euro project called NeuWalk that aims at designing a fully operative spinal neuroprosthetic system, much like the one used here with rats, for implanting into humans.
Ref.: Rubia van den Brand et al., Restoring voluntary control of locomotion after paralyzing spinal cord injury, Science, 2012, DOI: 10.1126/science.1217416

Comments (12)
by twm114
Godspeed gentlemen!
by anthrobotic
And tune in to the TRANSHUMANISM TEST PILOTS for more! http://goo.gl/neXax
by HarveyAshman
I was paralyzed Nov 4, 2010, Doctors said NO spinal damage but nerve damage at t11 and t12. I would like to try the therakpy that you tried on the rats. all my therapy so far has been on muscles not on nerves. No stimulation to the nerves. I live in Illinois, If you could you help, plese e-mail me back. Harvey, pa.ha@frontier.com
by shaun doran
i suffered much the same on c6 and c7 no spinal cord injury just nerve damage. i can move my legs a bit and i can stand but im very unsteady on my feet
by Nicholas Wind
Seems to be some serious concern about the mouse….wow!
It’s a f——— mouse .
by mental
LOL, seriously peter, your kind of false moralism is just pathetic. About 90 % of the things you use daily were probably tested on animals. Whether the drugs you used the last time you had a cold or the chemicals added to your food, your shampoo etc. Killing the rats with poison when they are in your house is legit. But oh no! Testing on them is being pervert. And who says rats says anything else. What you eat, for instance. Easy to be the moralist, but it gets pathetic in a civilization where this is inevitable. Well, you may wish to apply yourself to do these tests. Don’t you? “oh mr simmons, in fact you have a cold, what about if we give you this drug, it could kill you, maybe destroy your brain and infect your family, but we believe it could heal you”. Seriously, wake up. I understand the need of ethic principles to avoid any form of torture in animals, they do what they can to avoid it, as most out there. But you put your priorities on animals before than in humans. Yeah, you talk about “humans”, like if they are a kind of external thing, “others”. Well, it could be for you, you could need these tomorrow, your mother or your children if you have them. So if you are so disgusted, then you should be disgusted about yourself in the first place.
by lvel88
I’m anxious to know more.
by aus
Advances in medical science inevitably translate over to veterinary science.
by Peter Simmons
I find this kind of thing utterly disgusting. So these creeps slice through a creatures spinal chord, paralise it and then fiddle about to enable it to move again. Then of course they kill it to have a look inside. Perverts. I would never want to benefit from this abuse, I find it deeply offensive. Try it out on those who would benefit, humans.
by Kristoph77
Hey Pete, I bet you’d feel different if that research really did benfit you or your child or an other loved one, gotta break a few eggs to make an omlette…. Beside that little leather harness that littel guy is wearing is SHWEEET!
by Buck O'Fama
Perhaps they could test it on tofu, or you. Like there is any real difference.
by Vin
What an amazing adaptation. Course in hindsight it makes sense to distribute processing about a network as much as possible if I get this right. This sort of reminds me of the old reflex arc. It actually lends itself to an object orientated paradigm? That could be significant in future automation initiatives.